FLASH NEWS
Crime

Satyam’s Raju, brother get seven yrs jail, Rs 5.5 cr fine

Thursday, Apr 9, 2015,19:39 IST By metrovaartha A A A

Hyderabad | Satyam scam kingpin B Ramalinga Raju and his brother B Rama Raju were today sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment and fined a whopping Rs 5.5 crore after they were convicted by a special court in the Rs 7000-crore accounting fraud that shook the corporate world six years ago.
Eight others, including former Chief Financial Officer Vadlamani Srinivas, former Price Waterhouse auditors Subramani Gopalakrishnan and T Srinivas, were also sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment and fined varying amounts up to Rs 25 lakh by Special Judge B V L N Chakravarthi.
The 10 accused were convicted of criminal conspiracy and cheating among other offences in the scam dubbed as the country’s biggest accounting fraud. Once the poster boy of the ITeS industry, Byrraju Ramalinga Raju (60), and former employee G Ramakrishna were also found guilty under section 201 (causing disappearance of evidence of offence) of IPC by the judge in the case probed by CBI.
Except Raju’s another brother B Suryanarayana Raju and former internal chief auditor V S Prabhakar Gupta, all the other eight accused were found guilty under IPC sections 467, 468, 471 and 477A, relating to forgery of security, forgery for purpose of cheating and falsification of accounts, according to V Chandrashekhar, Superintendent of Police, CBI Hyderabad Zone. While the accounting fraud was to the tune of Rs 7,000 crore, it had caused an estimated notional loss of Rs 14,000 crore to investors and unlawful gains of Rs 1900 crore to Raju and others.
Ramalinga Raju and his brother and Satyam’s former Managing Director B Rama Raju were also found guilty under section 409 of IPC relating to criminal breach of trust. All the ten accused were present in the court, where media was not allowed, when the verdict was pronounced. After pronouncing the order, the judge directed the CBI to take all the accused into custody.
Satyam scam had come to light on January 7, 2009, after the firm’s founder and then Chairman Ramalinga Raju allegedly confessed to manipulating his company’s account books and inflating profits over many years. Raju was arrested by Andhra Pradesh Police’s Crime Investigation Department two days later after he allegedly confessed to the fraud, along with his brother Rama Raju and others.
Around 3,000 documents were marked and 226 witnesses examined during the trial that began nearly six years back. Besides Ramalinga Raju, the others accused are – B Rama Raju, former Chief Financial Officer Vadlamani Srinivas, former PwC auditors Subramani Gopalakrishnan and T Srinivas, Suryanarayana Raju, former employees G Ramakrishna, D Venkatpathi Raju and Ch Srisailam and Satyam’s former internal chief auditor V S Prabhakar Gupta.  Satyam was purchased by Mahindra & Mahindra owned company Tech Mahindra in April, 2009.

Former chairman of Indian outsourcing giant Satyam, B. Ramalinga Raju (C), arrives to attend the final judgement of a fraud case against him and nine others at the Metropolitan Criminal Courts in Hyderabad on April 9, 2015. An Indian court on April 9, 2015, sentenced the former chief of outsourcing giant Satyam to seven years in jail over a $2.25 billion accounting fraud scandal dubbed "India's Enron". Byrraju Ramalinga Raju, his brother and eight others were found guilty of manipulating Satyam's books in a 2009 case that shook the industry and raised questions about the country's regulators.

Former chairman of Indian outsourcing giant Satyam, B. Ramalinga Raju (C), arrives to attend the final judgement of a fraud case against him and nine others at the Metropolitan Criminal Courts in Hyderabad on April 9, 2015. An Indian court on April 9, 2015, sentenced the former chief of outsourcing giant Satyam to seven years in jail over a $2.25 billion accounting fraud scandal dubbed “India’s Enron”. Byrraju Ramalinga Raju, his brother and eight others were found guilty of manipulating Satyam’s books in a 2009 case that shook the industry and raised questions about the country’s regulators.